Market Wrap

Market Sentiment

Intraday Updates

Market Watch

Current Play List

Watch List

Trading Ideas

Email Version

Tech Stocks

New Plays

Play Updates

Closed Plays

Active Trader

New Plays

Play Updates

Closed Plays

High Risk/

New Plays

Play Updates

Closed Plays

Stock Splits

New Plays

Expected Splits

Play Updates

Closed Plays


Split Calendar

Split Candidates

New Candidates

Splits 101

Long-Term Plays

Tech Stocks

Non-Tech Stocks

Ask the Analyst

Bailey's Basics

Learning Center

Trader's Corner

Options Primer

Options 101

Splits 101

Trading 101




Live Charts

Dow 30 charts

Economic Calendar

Arms Index Charts

Terms of Service


Contact Us


Ask The Analyst, Sunday, 05/23/2004

Economics 101
By Jeff Bailey

It's summer time in the northern hemisphere and kids are looking forward to some time off from school, but this week's e-mail was largely comprised of questions centering around inflation, and various economic indicators.

While I'm not an economists, my business marketing/finance degree in college required me to sit in many a class and listen to the professor spew out tons of information and theory on economic indicators and how a student studying business should have a firm grasp of various economic indicators.

One thing I learned, which didn't become a core belief until after I got out in the "real world," was that you can give 5 economists or analysts the same set of data, and the odds are that you would get back 5 very different answers as to what the economic data was saying.

Gone now are some of the concerns for deflation that usually come from an economic recession, and sure enough, its inflation that is on everyone's mind as the U.S. and global economy improves.

Is there one single economic indicator that is MOST important to follow, or understand?

My answer, would be emphatically... NO!

That's why we get hammered with so many economic reports each week. And with these reports can come confusion, and sometimes a "rush to judgment" as to what that economic report may have suggested.

Based on some of the questions received this week, I thought I'd pick out a few economic reports that are released each month, place them in a table where we could look at some of the data, and try to understand, or get a feel, for how the various economic reports all mesh together, where somehow, the various markets we may be trying to trade/invest in, always seem to get it right, as they correctly predict the eventual outcome of what the economic data was saying.

Certainly there are times when the MARKET suddenly realizes it was wrong in its original analysis, and when it does (the MARKET that is), it is quick to adjust and make appropriate corrections.

I went through a very long list of various economic reports we are hammered with each month, and tried to pick out some of those that I feel can be of focus at this point in time.

During the recent recession, it was the housing market that was of great focus as the industrial and service portions of the economy were in decline, where construction of homes was one of the key drivers for keeping some pulse in the economy. While the homebuilding market will always be a key part of the U.S. economy, we won't be discussing those economic data in this column.

Certainly I will have left out something that you deem overly necessary to have considered, but by the time most of us get the crash course in Econ. 101, we will have had enough from some of the basics.

One of the most often-asked questions after an economic report has been released is "why did the market do this, and not that?"

Like I said.... give 5 economists the same set of data, and you'll probably get 5 different analysis of that data.

Hopefully I can try and walk through some of the things I've learned not only in college, but in life and from other business people, are how to at least think about various economic readings/reports, to try and build a foundation of just what the MARKET is thinking, and where we can look for clues for further confirmation of our economic analysis.

You may want to print the following table out in order to follow along with today's discussion.

Table of Economic Reports - Dec. 2003 to May 2004

Good gravy! This is the reduced version? Don't worry, I'm not going to go into great detail on every single number, but I wanted to at least give us 5-months of various economic report observations, so we can get a feel for what some of the economic reports have been.

At the top is quarterly Gross Domestic Product (GDP), where in the fourth quarter of 2003, the economy grew at a 4.1% annual rate. Recent economic data showed the economy grew at a 4.2% annual rate, where on May 27, we're going to get a potentially revised reading on the first quarter's GDP, which economists are currently forecasting an upward revision to 4.5%.

If you don't understand what Business Inventories are, or any of the other economic reports about to be discussed in brief, most of them are described in the EDUCATION section of the website under GLOSSARY.

Business Inventories and Sales: has been one of the most dynamic and sometimes misinterpreted (in my opinion) pieces of economic data. One of the biggest "rush to judgment" analyses is when the Business Inventory headline number is considered by itself, without any regard as to sales trends. One thing I learned from a client of mine (he managed a manufacturing plant in Puerto Rico for Hewlett Packard) was how a efficient corporations were becoming in the management of inventory (especially at the wholesale end of inventory). I was shocked to learn that that his plant actually overnight couriered in slats of microprocessors just ahead of a large production run. I told him that that was way too expensive, but he explained that holding INVENTORY of those processors (more storage space and that's costly, buy those processors months in advance and that's dead money sitting in storage until product is manufactured and then sold, an earthquake or geopolitical event could become costly for inventory held, etc.) Perhaps you've heard the term "just in time" inventory, where the concept is that your inventory shows up just in time to get it into production, and not let it sit around. Just in time inventory plays a BIG ROLE in why inventory to sales continues to decline.

An just what is "just in time" inventory a part of? PRODUCTIVITY!!!!!!!

That's right! PRODUCTIVITY which helps LOWER the COST of manufacturing goods. Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and other Fed governors are constantly talking about the rates of productivity as being a key part of their inflation/deflation analysis.

Wholesale Inventories: are the second stage of the manufacturing process, and perhaps more difficult for a business unit to handle, but can give important readings on demand for the Business Inventories, or first stage of a products manufacture. Certainly demand (sales) has been outstripping supply (inventory). Is this inflationary? Or is this dynamic partially created from PRODUCTIVITY?

Factory Orders: Once you've gotten information from Wholesale Inventories, the Factory Orders usually doesn't carry that much weight, but can still be an important demand observation, which helps separate out lower priced ticket items we call non-durable goods. This economic indicator can give us a QUANTITATIVE reading on consumer spending, where Consumer Sentiment readings are more anecdotal. One "fear" among some economists is that the recent rise in Treasury Yields, which has brought about a decline in mortgage refinancing, is that the consumer will not have has much money to spend. Factory Orders may give future insight to these fears being correct, or incorrect.

Durable Orders: or the Durable Goods report is the rate of spending (up or down) on big-ticket items that we expect to last at least three years. Televisions, refrigerators, office furniture are products that make up this category, and similar to the Factory Orders data, gives insight as to what types of products consumers are buying. Are we rewarding ourselves with a new shirt or blouse this month, or are we feeling wealthier and buying that flat panel TV that just came out?

Industrial Production: was one of my FAVORITE classes in college was industrial production. Running all those simulators and trying to forecast what demand would be in order to set up my production to efficiently meet that demand. This is one of those economic reports that can also be grossly misinterpreted. Did industrial production fall because of accurately perceived economic slowing? Or did industry underestimate demand one month, and have to ramp up production the next month to catch up? We would be encouraged to monitor SALES at both the Business and Wholesale level when trying to analyze Industrial Production figures.

Capacity Utilization : is released along with Industrial Production. Capacity Utilization at 100% would consider all AVAILABLE production capacity, even if a portion of that capacity had been shut down for 2-years. Capacity Utilization can be a key reading in regards to inflation. Is there enough capacity still yet to be utilized before "full capacity" is reached, where demand is so great, that higher prices can be charged? 12 months ago, capacity utilization was 74.2 and considered a recessionary figure. Current levels are just starting to show Industrial Production starting to build and economic slack from the recession being absorbed.

Productivity: we touched on earlier. The United States is thought to be a leader in technological advancements, and it is from technological advancement that productivity can thrive. Productivity measures are one of the key measures we should use when interpreting other economic readings.

Nonfarm Payrolls: have been showing some life the past two months. Here again, think about PRODUCTIVITY and what its impact may have had, or still does have on the amount of workers needed to perform a task. PRODUCTIVITY is good for cost efficiency, but because of higher productivity rates, it may only take the work of 1 to do what 2 workers did years ago. Earlier this year, it was thought by some that the economy wasn't going to start generating a meaningful number of jobs until early 2005. We've seen the bond market's reaction to the stronger than expected nonfarm payroll data the past two months.

Average Workweek: speaks to PRODUCTIVITY, but gives greater insight as to demand building or contracting among businesses. Since I started working for a living at age 18, I can't remember working less that 40 hours a week.

Hourly Earnings: will be measured for a sense of not only wage inflation, but the "quality" of job that might have been created. This is another number that can be misconstrued if not looked into. Is wage inflation being found if hourly wages rise? Or are higher paying jobs being generated? This data can be found inside the nonfarm payrolls data, and is broken down into many categories like temporary help, leisure/hospitality, financial, manufacturing, construction and several others. At this stage of the economic recover, hourly earnings and wage costs are not an overriding employment concern, where many economists also cite strong PRODUCTIVITY growth trends limiting rising wage costs.

Consumer Confidence: is largely driven by a consumers view of job availability, income, geopolitics and believe it or not.... stock market gains and losses. The reading indicated are derived from survey questions, where responses are considered anecdotal. Reading will be observed, but history shows that respondents don't necessarily always ACT as they say they FEEL. I tend to think of this as an emotional survey, where emotions can change quickly.

PPI and Core PPI: give us insight as to rising (inflation) or falling (deflation) prices at the production/manufacturing level. Many will dispute if these reading are an accurate measure of prices at the manufacturing level. The Core PPI excludes the more volatile food and energy components, as sometimes brief imbalances in supply/demand due to weather or geopolitical events should be brought into consideration when trying to interpret price volatility at the manufacturing level.

CPI and Core CPI: give insight as to rising (inflation) or falling (deflation) prices at the consumer level. Not unlike the PPI data, there are disputes if these readings are accurate. Here again, PRODUCTIVITY rates should be observed when making a comparison of PPI to CPI data. While higher prices at the producer level can be found, high rates of PRODUCTIVITY can allow for steady pricing at the consumer level.

Treasury Budget: is a monthly account of the U.S. government's surplus (more receipts than outlays) or deficit (more outlays than receipts). The year-to-date deficit worsened by $80 billion from a year earlier, while the 12-month deficit stands at $454 billion. My personal view is that while the deficit matters, at this point of an economic cycle, which certainly appears to be robust, tax receipts should begin to rise and help stem the rise in the deficit. Economists currently see the 2004 deficit at $370 billion, while the White House forecast is higher at $521 billion. I was critical of the Treasury when it told investors it would cease auctioning off 30-year debt, when the long bond's yield was falling. In my mind, if my cost of borrowing (when the government sells/auctions off its bonds it is borrowing) is falling, and I can borrow longer-term at a lower cost to borrow, then that's where I would want to try and borrow. There are criticisms to the size of the deficit and I have my criticisms too. But if you're going to build a deficit in order to try and turn an economy around to growth, while at the same time funding a war, then the "best time" to do it is at 45-year lows rates of borrowing. My core belief is that a strong economy will pay down a deficit, and a weak economy will usually find a rising deficit. Nonfarm payroll figures will be monitored closely as an additional generator of tax receipts will be needed to eventually pay down the deficit.

M2 Money Supply: shows growth, where this growth in money supply has fueled what many economists call a "monetary led expansion." Monthly M2 Money growth and velocity provide a very rough read on the growth/inflation outlook over the intermediate term. Over the long term, inflation is thought to be led by money growth. However, this has become a point of dispute as recent evidence isn't all that convincing as the 2001 M2 growth rate ran at the fastest pace since 1983 as continued strong M2 growth in 2002 and early 2003 had the Fed concerned about DEFLATION risks. In late 2003, M2 fell as economic growth surged and money flowed to higher yielding investments from commercial banks, which is not Fed policy related. Some of the inflation fears you may be hearing about, in regards to the surge in money supply may not fully account for the possibility that the renewed growth in money supply may not necessarily be Fed driven, but commercial banks capturing profit from prior investments. In a prior Ask the Analyst (07/20/03) column titled "Money supply is surging, but where's it going?" greater detail of M1, M2 and M3 money supply is discussed. Has anyone noticed that stock prices have fallen lately, while money supply has grown? Is Fed policy currently in error and the rise in money supply a sign of inflation?

Well that's it for Econ 101.

Below these various economic indicators/reports, I've placed the recent closing values of various market indices we will discuss and analyze throughout time. Only the Fed funds rate is derived by one body, the Federal Open Market Committee, while all others are derived by the MARKET (you, me and others).

The one point I would want to make is in regards to questions regarding just ONE economic report and trying to analyze the stock or bond market in the scope of that one specific report.

Late last year, one analyst said he thought stock prices were going to fall because M2 had stalled and actually showed a decline. That looks to have been a good call.

It's interesting though that while M2 was growing rabidly in 2003, it was the rising price of gold that was this signal along with a rising M2 that was spelling future inflation.

That is until gold fell, but now M2 rises, that gold is not really the indicator for inflation, but instead, its M2. Wait, no.... M2 was rising in 2003 and there wasn't inflation.

Oh... wait a minute. The rising dollar is the signal for inflation that will bust the stock market bubble. Ooops! The dollar was strong during the great bull market of the 1990's.

Aha! It's the rising deficit and lack of job growth combined with rising commodity prices that will.......

Don't get confused and feel that you have to FULLY comprehend every detail of economic data, and fully comprehend what that ONE single report is saying, but it does help to have a basic understanding of how many of the reports combined create the bigger economic picture.

Don't be confused, or swayed by the friend that tells you just because Business Inventories are trending lower, that it is a sure sign of economic slowing. Ask them what there views are on the decline in Business Inventories as it relates to rising sales and the current rate of productivity.

Is the disparity between Producer Prices and Consumer Prices a governmental plot to mislead economists and investors? Or does productivity, have something to do with the disparity?

Jeff Bailey


Terms of Service Disclaimer Privacy Policy Contact Us
Copyright 2001 - Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form